10 Responses to “ Einstein’s Idiots # 9 — The Secret Law Of Attraction ”

1. R3p0rt4j35 on October 5th, 2009 10:17 am

   Bill Why fight wih the idiots if they do not understand leave them to be. They wont understand, look you’ve come from talking about the law of attraction to if god exists.Let the idiots be.

2. fiesta181 on October 5th, 2009 10:54 am

   be idiot, be ah ah ah

3. fiesta181 on October 5th, 2009 10:57 am

   *Bill Why fight wih the idiots…?*Because the presenter is being confronted whit simple, fair and rational questions about his hypothesis, questions those that must be answered in order to “prove that Einstein was an idiot.” (and wrong).Btw Report, (this might seem a trick question and maybe it is) do we prove anything in science?

4. MopDMTBARTL on October 5th, 2009 11:48 am

   God isnt here 4 an explanation of things, thats 4 science God is here 4 LOVE. Jesus may have lived, may have been just a story. Its the MESSAGE that is the most important. Always put out Love-positive energy & its up to US 2 put out that positive energy. I only need God for Love. You still need science 2 explain everything, figure out the truth, continue to shape our beliefs & knowledge. All LOGIC. God is just a supplement LOVE. Thats it. I hate religion btw. truthknowledge. com

5. bgaede on October 5th, 2009 12:44 pm

   “God isnt here 4 an explanation of things”Exactly! God is simply a crutch. He’s no explanation at all. Anyone can explain with magic or irrationality. Science is about explaining rationally.youstupidrelativist com/02Sci/03SciRel html

6. artistfood on October 5th, 2009 1:06 pm

   That was interesting. I really like the jump roping example but can you explain double dutching?

7. bgaede on October 5th, 2009 1:47 pm

   “can you explain double dutching?”Obviously, you are unfamiliar with the Scientific Method. In Science, we don’t ‘explain’ double dutching. In Science, double dutching, if anything, explains a phenomenon of nature. One example is WHY magnets repel.

8. hoyohoyohoyow on October 5th, 2009 2:14 pm

   cool hypothesis, so i guess what we ask ourselves now, is what makes up these threads

9. bgaede on October 5th, 2009 3:05 pm

   “what makes up these threads”The rope hypothesis postulates that the threads are the fundamental building ‘blocks’ of all matter. They are not made of smaller components. They are the smallest component. Something’s gotta be!

10. bgaede on October 5th, 2009 3:40 pm

    If the EM rope has physical presence (ie. is an object and has location wrt other objects) it exists BY DEFINITION and not because we run a test.

Leave a Reply